Naga telephone company vs ca digest
Legal Assistant or Paralegal or Administrative Assistant. Jump to Page. Search inside document. Petition denied.
CA decision affirmed. Maya Julieta Catacutan-Estabillo. Kelsey Olivar Mendoza. Gear Arellano II. Fides Damasco. Dia Santos. Ella Tho. Kenneth Peter Molave. Lariza Aidie Reynalda Ugsod. Rafael Conejos. Latjing Soliman. Mae Ann Sarte Acha. Mikey Go. Chrys Barcena. Janz Serrano. More From Sui.
Journey to the A-T-T-Y-.
Tolentino, Article states in our law the doctrine of unforseen events. This is said to be based on the discredited theory of rebus sic stantibus in public international law; under this theory, the parties stipulate in the light of certain prevailing conditions, and once these conditions cease to exist the contract also ceases to exist.
Considering practical needs and the demands of equity and good faith, the disappearance of the basis of a contract gives rise to a right to relief in favor of the party prejudiced. The allegations in private respondent's complaint and the evidence it has presented sufficiently made out a cause of action under Article The Court, therefore, release the parties from their correlative obligations under the contract. However, the disposition of the present controversy does not end here. The Court has to take into account the possible consequences of merely releasing the parties therefrom: The Court shall not allow such eventuality.
Rather, the Court requires, as ordered by the trial court: By way of emphasis, the Court reiterates the rationalization of respondent court that: In affirming said ruling, we are not making a new contract for the parties herein, but we find it necessary to do so in order not to disrupt the basic and essential services being rendered by both parties herein to the public and to avoid unjust enrichment by appellant at the expense of plaintiff. Decision affirmed.
Case digest for Obligations and Contract impossibility of condition. Flag for inappropriate content. CA Case Digest. Related titles. Reparations Commission v. Universal Deep Sea Fishing. Assignement 3 - 21 DBP v. Family Foods Manufacturing.
Right at Home: Is There a Right to Territory? Alexandra R. Jump to Page. Search inside document. Rowena Gallego. Emir Mendoza. Jomz Arvesu. Beeya Echauz.
Ronwell Lim. Erin Gamer. Liaa Aquino. Dia Santos. Jed Macaibay. Clint M. Francine Gutierrez. Jane Jaramillo. Laura R. Elaine Tolentino. Hannah Lois Tidalgo. Kym Leiner Hernandez.
Case Digest: NAGA TELEPHONE CO. v. CA
More From MoireeG. Popular in Legal Concepts. Johnny Mackinhoes. Aaron Sparks. Hans Chamorro. Danilo Siqueira. Jorela Tipan.